Evaluation

In the final evaluation, the portfolios were given greater empashis  –in accordance with the same evaluation criteria  published on the website– as the mechanism for communicating the process and results of the common exercises done in class, and the only element that was required for improvement (if intended). Reminding you how the grades are divided : Requested files  (marked in black in the table); Portfolios, in .PDF format; Files for the Rhino exercises, in .3DM format;

These grades are provisional and will be reassessed according to the elements received in the 4th submission (to be made by November 09th, until 10 PM). NOTE : There may be students who sent the submissions within the stipulated deadline, but due to a storage error, those elements may have been accidentally deleted. In this case, I ask that you resend these elements in this delivery. The exercises don't yet have individual ratings, because only at the end will it be possible

When evaluating portfolios, the following criteria are primarily considered: Presentation of all requested elements : Images of the process ; Final result ; Main element; Individual/secondary elements, when applicable. Consistency of the presentation : Font : Same font throughout the presentation, or, alternatively, similar/complementary fonts; Text size : Sizes not too disparate; Analogous sizes between texts of the same type; Alignments : Analogous alignments between the sa

The submission of works will always be on the 1st Sunday of each month, via email, except for the final submission. The evaluation will be based on the weighted sum of the exercises prepared during the semester according to: its complexity, monitoring and development of exercises; the quality of the proposed solutions; discursive ability about the exercises and subjects given (verified through the presentation of a report); Students with an assessment of less than 7.00 will b