Continuous evaluation (rectified)
- Eduardo Durão Antunes
- 5 days ago
- 1 min read
In the final evaluation, only the portfolios were taken into account –in accordance with the same evaluation criteria published on the website– as the mechanism for communicating the results of the exercises done in class, and the only element that was required for improvement (if intended); apart from the last exercise, where the greater individuality of each person's work meant that the plans were assessed on their own.
Given the greater complexity of this last exercise, greater weight was also given to these elements –which, I remind you, should always have been two plans: 1) a ground-level plan, and 2) another roof or cabins plan– and they were assessed individually (per plan), although aggregated –in the case of the person/group having developed two or three arenas.
The portfolio wasn't left out of this exercise, although it wasn't given as much weight, serving only as a complement and personal verification of the plans.
Comentarios